Toyota might not be off the hook just yet in a lawsuit over soy-based wiring that some drivers say has attracted hungry rodents.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court's dismissal of the implied warranty claims, with a few exceptions, from a 4-year-old lawsuit against Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A. in a decision filed Wednesday. The appeals court upheld the dismissal of state law fraud and consumer protection claims.
The lawsuit, filed in August 2016, alleges Toyota's switch to soy-based insulation for engine wiring — instead of petroleum-based insulation — is attractive to hungry rodents.
Lead plaintiff attorney Brian Kabateck filed the suit on behalf of Albert Heber in Indiana, who paid around $1,500 to fix the wiring of his 2012 Toyota Tundra that was chewed through three separate times. Several more plaintiffs came forward after Heber's claims. The suit says the company should cover the damages under warranty…